| |
I had the opportunity to
attend the presentation of Ken Blanchard in VNULearning Training
Conference on Oct. 18. Two key points stuck in my mind:
- Technology-based training tends
to dump too much knowledge to the learners.
- It provides less opportunity
to apply the ideas.
Ken’s comments hit right smack
into the heart of rapid e-learning. Most e-learning development
is slow, not primarily because of poor technology or software
or non-cooperative technology staff and team members. The tendency
is to carry over or migrate the classroom training workbooks or
subject matter expert’s ideas on what ought to be learned
directly into e-learning without critical thinking. As a consequence,
the content is bloated, too heavy and massive to convert to any
form of media, might that be video, PowerPoint, HTML, Flash or
images. It does not only become slow, but also it becomes really
costly. The other consequence
is that many of us become very busy in migrating or repurposing
content, forgetting the more important issue: would learners
have the chance to apply the ideas? Why is this important? Applying
learning is our only way to help learners perform in their jobs.
So less applications in learning will mean learning without
performance or lack of delivery in results. In most organizations
this is not an acceptable situation.
A case in point: a national chain
of retail stores (4,500 stores in the US) have very high staff
turnover – about 500% per year. Mostly, new hires stay
for a few weeks and then leave. When I interviewed the e-trainers-developers
and subject experts – I asked: What should the training
of this staff look like? They presented to me a six-month program
consisting of 3 curriculums and 80 modules. The problem with
this response seemed obvious – but not really, to the
many.
I followed up my own question.
What would happen if we only provide the shortest required training
to boost performance in critical jobs during the fist few weeks?
Guess what was the response? “No,
we can’t do that since they need to learn all the steps
of the content.”
Learning from Ken’s ideas,
I suggest e-trainers and developers add to the critical evaluation
this key question: Should we train learners on all of the content,
instead of training them on the small content that really matters
so that way they can perform?.
Ray E. Jimenez, PhD
rjimenez@vignettestraining.com
Vignettes for Training, Inc.
www.vignettestraining.com
Office: (626) 930-0160
» Back to top |